Colorado Secretary Of State Makes Decision After Controversial Ruling

Amidst a flurry of legal proceedings, the inclusion of former President Donald Trump on the 2024 Colorado primary ballot has sparked contentious debates, culminating in an intricate legal tussle that has now reached the nation’s highest court.

The Colorado GOP’s appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court follows the state Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump from the primary ballot, setting the stage for an unprecedented showdown.

After the Colorado GOP filed an appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the state Supreme Court’s ruling, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold made a significant announcement. She declared her intention to include Donald Trump on the primary ballot by the Jan. 5 certification deadline, unless the U.S. Supreme Court either upholds the lower court’s decision or declines to intervene in the case.

“Donald Trump engaged in insurrection and was disqualified under the Constitution from the Colorado Ballot,” Griswold said in a press release.

“The Colorado Supreme Court got it right. This decision is now being appealed,” she continued. “I urge the U.S. Supreme Court to act quickly given the upcoming presidential primary election.”

Griswold’s stance on Trump’s eligibility hinged on allegations of insurrection, asserting that Trump’s actions disqualified him under constitutional grounds from appearing on the Colorado ballot. However, this contentious decision faced pushback, notably from the Colorado GOP, arguing that the Colorado Supreme Court’s move disregarded political parties’ First Amendment rights to choose their candidates and the people’s rights to select their elected representatives.

The legal battleground extends beyond Colorado’s borders, with Michigan’s Supreme Court providing a contrasting ruling that upheld Trump’s inclusion on the primary ballot. This conflicting legal landscape has created an unprecedented situation, one that has drawn the attention of the U.S. Supreme Court, presenting a crucial case that could set a legal precedent nationwide.

The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision, initially set to take effect on Jan. 4, held implications for the looming deadline to send out primary ballots to military voters by Jan. 20. With the process of mailing ballots to voters scheduled to commence on Feb. 12 and the onset of primary voting by Feb. 26, the timeline presented complications in the event of further legal interventions or alterations.

The impending decision by the U.S. Supreme Court looms large over the electoral process, with ramifications likely to influence the electoral landscape leading up to Super Tuesday on March 5. The uncertainties surrounding the fate of already released ballots in the event of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision adds complexity to an already intricate legal puzzle.

“By excluding President Trump from the ballot, the Colorado Supreme Court engaged in an unprecedented disregard for the First Amendment right of political parties to select the candidates of their choice and a usurpation of the rights of the people to choose their elected officials,” attorneys for the state Republican party wrote in a petition after the Dec. 19 ruling.

As the legal saga unfolds, the outcome of this high-stakes legal battle will not only impact the 2024 Colorado primary but could also establish a far-reaching legal precedent with implications for electoral processes across the nation.

Fox News