Well, here we are—sifting through the wreckage of Joe Biden’s presidency, and let’s just say, it’s not pretty. As if inflation, border chaos, and global instability weren’t enough, now we have to ask a truly unsettling question: Did Biden even know what he was signing in his final months in office?
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey certainly isn’t convinced. In a letter to the DOJ, he’s raising a serious constitutional concern—if Biden was as mentally unfit as his own allies have admitted, then do his last executive actions even count? Were they lawfully enacted, or were they the work of unelected staffers using the deteriorating president as a puppet to push their far-left agenda? And if Biden wasn’t of sound mind, should those decisions be overturned? These aren’t just political talking points; they’re legitimate legal questions that could have major implications.
Bailey’s concern is simple: If Biden is as cognitively impaired as even his own allies seem to admit, then who exactly has been pulling the strings for the last four years? According to high-profile Democrat Lindy Li, the answer is his wife, his son Hunter (which should terrify everyone), and his White House staff.
Now, if that sounds like a constitutional crisis waiting to happen, that’s because it is. America didn’t elect a committee to run the country. We didn’t vote for an anonymous team of bureaucrats to use Biden as their rubber-stamp-in-chief while they quietly shove radical leftist policies through the system. We elected a President—or at least, we were supposed to.
Let’s not forget the Special Counsel Robert Hur report, which basically described Biden as a confused grandpa who didn’t even know what decade it was. Hur’s investigation wasn’t just about Biden’s mishandling of classified documents—it was a glaring red flag that the man holding the nuclear codes struggles to recall basic details of his own life.
The phrase “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory” was supposed to excuse Biden from facing criminal charges, but really, it raises a much bigger problem. If he wasn’t competent enough to form criminal intent, then how is he competent enough to be making executive orders that affect the lives of hundreds of millions of Americans?
Bailey’s letter lays out a particularly damning example: Biden allegedly had no idea what orders he was signing. House Speaker Mike Johnson recounted an instance in which Biden thought he had merely authorized a study on energy exports, when in reality, he had approved a moratorium.
That’s not just a harmless mistake—that’s outright proof that Biden is not in control. And if he’s not in control, then who is? We already know his handlers go to great lengths to shield him from unscripted interactions. The real question is: how far have they gone in using his mental decline as an opportunity to push their own radical policies?
One of the biggest concerns raised in Bailey’s letter is Biden’s record on clemencies and pardons. His administration has gone on a spree of releasing convicted criminals, branding them as “non-violent,” even when some of them were involved in horrific crimes. One such case involves an individual convicted in the killing of a mother and her 8-year-old child. If Biden didn’t knowingly approve these actions, does that mean they’re invalid? Does that mean states like Missouri should be revisiting these cases, as Bailey suggests? That’s a serious legal question, and the American people deserve an answer.
🚨BREAKING: I am demanding the DOJ investigated whether President Biden’s cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval.
If true, these executive orders, pardons, and all other actions are unconstitutional and legally void. pic.twitter.com/pOhATRfw2j
— Attorney General Andrew Bailey (@AGAndrewBailey) March 5, 2025
At the heart of this issue is a fundamental truth that Democrats don’t want to admit: Biden was never really in charge. From the moment he stepped into office, he was a little more than a figurehead for the progressive machine, rubber-stamping radical policies while his handlers controlled the narrative. If this is confirmed—if unelected staffers have been exploiting Biden’s mental state to push through policies without his full knowledge—then we’re looking at one of the greatest political scandals in modern history.
Bailey puts it best: “I fear that Mr. Biden, while he held the office of President, did so in name only and was a mere puppet for far-left, unelected staffers.” That’s not just speculation—that’s a warning sign for the entire country. And if the DOJ has any shred of integrity left, they should be taking a long, hard look at who’s really been running the show. Because at this point, it sure doesn’t look like it was Joe Biden.
