Megan Rapinoe has returned to one of the most contentious debates in women’s sports, and this time WNBA guard Sophie Cunningham and former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines are directly in her sights.
Speaking on her “Why Are You Like This?” podcast, the retired U.S. Women’s National Team soccer star addressed transgender participation in women’s sports and criticized Cunningham after the Indiana Fever player posed for a photograph with Gaines following a game against the Minnesota Lynx.
“I want to address the controversy that is happening right now around trans women in sports,” Rapinoe began. “As you know, I’ve talked about this a lot and will continue to keep talking about this.”
Rapinoe has been an outspoken supporter of transgender inclusion in sports. Gaines has become one of the country’s most prominent advocates for maintaining female sports categories based on sex.
Cunningham’s involvement in the latest argument came through a photograph.
“I don’t know Sophie, so I can only project what I see about her beliefs based on her actions, and seeing a picture of her with Riley Gaines after the game told me everything I need to know about what’s happening,” Rapinoe said.
That’s quite a conclusion to draw from a photograph, particularly after acknowledging that she doesn’t personally know Cunningham.
Rapinoe continued by pointing to Cunningham’s statements about supporting both transgender people and Title IX.
“Sophie has claimed both to love trans people and support Title IX. And this is where I think the accountability with having a major platform is extremely important,” she said.
Then Rapinoe turned directly to Gaines.
“Riley Gaines has made it her life’s mission to exclude trans people from public life,” Rapinoe claimed.
Gaines would certainly reject that characterization. Her activism has centered on sex-based protections in women’s sports, and the reason she entered that political fight isn’t some distant hypothetical.
Little girls belong! https://t.co/Ik8IgVIvN9 pic.twitter.com/1tRK4bMuE2
— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) August 2, 2026
Gaines competed against Lia Thomas at the 2022 NCAA Women’s Swimming and Diving Championships. Thomas, a transgender woman who had previously competed on the University of Pennsylvania men’s swimming team, won the women’s 500-yard freestyle NCAA championship. Gaines and Thomas tied for fifth in the 200-yard freestyle.
That experience subsequently became central to Gaines’ campaign against allowing transgender women who experienced male puberty to compete in female athletic categories.
Whatever someone thinks of Gaines’ position, eliminating that history from the discussion makes it considerably harder to understand why she became involved in the issue in the first place.
Rapinoe instead connected Gaines to the Heritage Foundation and its conservative political agenda, arguing that the movement threatens protections provided by Title IX.
She also challenged the language used by opponents of transgender inclusion.
“You can hear it even in the language being used that the root of trans exclusion is to protect young girls from men,” Rapinoe said.
She argued that transgender girls are themselves children and that restrictions at the youth level can prevent them from participating in sports with their peers.
“These laws are excluding kids. Kids from playing youth sports,” she said.
That gets closer to the substantive disagreement, although youth recreation and elite women’s competition raise different questions.
At elite levels, where small physiological differences can determine scholarships, roster positions, records and championships, opponents of transgender inclusion argue that the effects of male puberty can create competitive advantages that hormone treatment does not necessarily eliminate.
Rapinoe believes existing policies can handle those concerns.
“If we want to have a conversation around elite sports, there are effective policies that have been in place for many years that no one noticed because they worked,” she said.
International and American sporting organizations have hardly reached a universal consensus on that proposition. Rules governing transgender eligibility have changed substantially across different sports and governing bodies, with some organizations restricting participation in female categories based on puberty or sex while others have adopted different eligibility standards.
That continuing disagreement is precisely why the controversy hasn’t disappeared.
Exclude trans people? They’re fighting for what’s fair.
Megan Rapinoe goes on an UNHINGED rant, accusing Sophie Cunningham and @Riley_Gaines_ of pushing nonsense because they’re trying to protect women’s sports. pic.twitter.com/Pbv2JVQ679
— OutKick (@Outkick) August 6, 2026
Rapinoe finished by challenging the motives and arguments of those advocating sex-based restrictions.
“If anybody is taking these talking points as legit or believing they’re protecting young girls in sports? I just have to ask, are you serious?”
Yes, they are serious.
So are Rapinoe and those who agree with her.
The more revealing part of her comments is the treatment of Cunningham. Rather than beginning with a specific statement from the Fever guard and challenging its substance, Rapinoe acknowledged that she doesn’t know Cunningham and then inferred her beliefs from a photograph with Gaines.
That substitutes association for argument.
Gaines has publicly explained why she believes women’s sports should remain sex-based. Rapinoe has publicly explained why she believes transgender athletes should be included. Those positions can be compared, challenged and debated on their merits.
Cunningham shouldn’t require Rapinoe’s permission to stand next to either one of them.
And a photograph isn’t much of a substitute for asking her what she actually believes.
