Senator Grassley Releases Docs On Federal Operations

In the shadows of our national institutions, the rot deepens — and no, this isn’t hyperbole. While the country’s attention span has been deliberately fractured by a blitz of sensationalism and culture war noise, a pattern of politically motivated surveillance and manipulation has quietly metastasized inside the very agencies sworn to uphold justice.

Enter Operation Arctic Frost — a classified FBI operation that was quietly monitoring high-profile conservatives, including U.S. Senators and grassroots organizations like Turning Point USA. The timing of this revelation couldn’t be more disturbing: the documents, unearthed by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), came just days after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, a tragic and pivotal moment that many on the left dismissed with astonishing indifference. But this wasn’t just about one operation — this was about who ordered it and why.


According to Grassley, the individuals responsible are the highest-ranking officials in American law enforcement: Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy AG Lisa Monaco, and FBI Director Chris Wray. These aren’t mid-level bureaucrats gone rogue. These are the top brass, steering the ship of state with full knowledge and authority.

Worse still, the surveillance was nested inside Jack Smith’s broader Trump investigations, opening the door to mission creep — a term used when the scope of an investigation subtly, and often deliberately, expands beyond its original intent. That shift isn’t just a bureaucratic misstep. It’s a red flag — a sign that political targets were being eyed under the guise of legal scrutiny.


And yet, this is only a slice of the corruption. If Operation Arctic Frost is alarming, it pales in comparison to the long-unraveling Russiagate debacle. With Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s recent declassification of documents, we now have confirmation that Barack Obama directed the infamous Steele Dossier — a Clinton-funded opposition research hit job — to be included in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. This was no passive mistake. It was orchestrated and rubber-stamped by senior figures like James Clapper and John Brennan.

Brennan’s 2023 testimony before Congress now looks, at best, evasive — at worst, knowingly false. He dismissed the dossier as irrelevant to the CIA’s analysis. But the newly released files say otherwise. In fact, the dossier was not only circulated internally but treated as a key piece of the puzzle — the very puzzle that launched years of divisive inquiry and public distrust.