Lindsay Clancy Trial Sparks Debate On Social Contagion

Experts are debating whether the intense media focus on Lindsay Clancy’s trial has inspired other mothers to kill their children. Since the trial began in July, at least eight cases have emerged where mothers allegedly killed or tried to kill their kids.

According to the New York Post, Corie Walsh, a mother from Illinois, is accused of hanging her 2-year-old son after closely monitoring the Clancy case. Indiana mom Shatayvia Alisha Calderon executed her 9-year-old son weeks after sharing a fundraiser for Clancy’s family.

Specialists say these headline-grabbing cases show signs of “social contagion,” a theory suggesting high-profile violence can spark copycats. Dan Romer from the Annenberg Public Policy Center stated to the New York Post that this aligns with the contagion model, particularly given the extensive media coverage.

Romer has investigated whether the Netflix show “13 Reasons Why” triggered a surge in youth suicides. He noted that watching Clancy and her supporters might resonate with other disturbed mothers on the brink.

Dr. Susan Hatters-Friedman, a psychiatrist affiliated with Case Western Reserve University, thinks the massive interest surrounding the Clancy case plays a significant role.

Hatters-Friedman worries that some people might start to crave the attention Clancy received. She questioned whether an individual with a specific personality type could begin contemplating actions to gain such attention. Could this be putting the idea in people’s minds?

She also noted that parents planning to kill their children might try to give them a good last day. “If a parent is planning to kill their child, they might want them to have a good last day, so they might treat them to nice things that make them happy,” Hatters-Friedman said.

Not everyone agrees that media coverage is the main cause of these tragedies. Specialists warn that confirmation bias might be at play, causing people to focus more on cases resembling Clancy’s following the trial.

Hatters-Friedman observed a shift in how patients discuss these events during therapy sessions. “People are now coming into their mental-health appointments thinking about it and talking about it,” Hatters-Friedman said.