Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Gives Update On Tariffs During Daily Briefing

Oh, the irony. The sweet, delectable irony of watching Nancy Pelosi’s old speeches come back to bite her like a boomerang with a grudge. Because here we are, in the year of our Lord 2025, with the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt standing at the podium and basically quoting Nancy verbatim—only now it’s President Donald Trump who’s taking action, and suddenly the Democrats act like tariffs are some sort of constitutional crisis.

Leavitt’s takedown during Tuesday’s briefing wasn’t just a jab—it was a masterclass in using the Democrats’ own dusty archives as ammo. She resurrected a 1996 floor speech from Pelosi where she absolutely raged against the U.S.-China trade relationship. Back then, Pelosi sounded like a MAGA warrior in a pantsuit, railing about China’s 35% tariffs, their paltry 2% allowance of U.S. exports, and the lopsided deal that saw American jobs get shipped off by the millions while we played global economic charity. Pelosi wanted action. She wanted the president to draw a line. She said the “status quo” was killing American jobs.

Fast forward to today: President Trump has taken that speech to heart—likely without meaning to—and delivered exactly the kind of economic punch Pelosi once begged for. A 104% retaliatory tariff on Chinese goods. That’s not just drawing a line; that’s bulldozing a trench. And now? Now the same Democrats who once cried for economic justice are clutching their pearls, shrieking about trade wars and global instability like they didn’t have years to fix this mess themselves.

Let’s get one thing straight. Trump didn’t invent the China problem—he’s just the first one in a generation to stop pretending it didn’t exist. The Chinese Communist Party has been playing three-dimensional chess while we were busy outsourcing everything from semiconductors to shoelaces. And while Pelosi and her colleagues offered strongly-worded letters and symbolic gestures, Trump just dropped the economic equivalent of a steel-toed boot on Beijing’s toes.

So now Pelosi’s old words are resurfacing, and they sound awfully familiar. Too familiar. Leavitt was almost charitable in her delivery—almost. She quoted Pelosi’s own righteous indignation from the ’90s: “How far does China have to go?” Well, Nancy, apparently not much further. Because Trump answered your question with a policy. He did something—you know, that thing you begged for back when the fax machine was cutting-edge tech.

The truth is, Democrats only liked the tough-on-China talk when it was safely theoretical. When it was useful for grandstanding and hitting the Republican president of the day. But now that Trump’s actions are actually holding China accountable and flipping the script on trade, suddenly the moral outrage has gone silent. Funny how that works.

And let’s not forget—this isn’t just about economics. It’s about security, sovereignty, and basic fairness. We’ve been the world’s economic doormat for far too long, letting foreign regimes exploit our open markets while building up their own authoritarian strongholds. Trump’s move isn’t just a financial response—it’s a geopolitical correction. And it’s about time.

So yes, Nancy, you can go ahead and thank President Trump. He did what you once claimed to want. Of course, now that it’s not your team in charge, you’re likely to pretend you never said any of it. But we have the receipts. And apparently, so does Karoline Leavitt.

Maybe next time, Democrats should be more careful with their righteous speeches. You never know when someone’s actually going to take them seriously.